Enns v. Canada, 2025 FCA 14: When is a Spouse Is No Longer a Spouse? Can the Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) hold a surviving spouse personally liable for a deceased partner’s unpaid taxes simply because the survivor received the proceeds
Section 280.1 Penalties and Subsection 296(2.1) – Allowance of Unclaimed Rebates Section 280.1 of the Excise Tax Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. E-15 (“ETA”) imposes a penalty when a person fails to file a Part IX return (GST/HST net tax return) by
CRA GST/HST Audits: Why the “Builder” Characterization Matters in Tax Litigation For Canadian real estate investors, developers and property owners, few GST/HST issues can have consequences as significant as whether a taxpayer is a “builder” for purposes of the Excise
Fadali v. His Majesty the King, 2026 TCC 86 & Paragraph 123(1)(f) of the Excise Tax Act The Tax Court of Canada’s recent decision in Fadali v. His Majesty the King, 2026 TCC 86 [Fadali] illustrates the importance of paragraph
Director Liability: Madison v. Canada, 2012 FCA 80 & Canada v. Colitto, 2020 FCA 70 When a corporation fails to remit trust amounts such as payroll source deductions, the Canada Revenue Agency’s (“CRA”) recovery options do not end with the
Business vs. Adventure or Concern in the Nature of Trade “Adventure or concern in the nature of trade” is not defined in the Excise Tax Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. E-15 (“ETA”). In Aviva Canada Inc. (formerly CGU Group Canada Ltd.)
Understanding Competent Authority Assistance under Canada’s Tax Treaties (MAP) International taxation can be complicated, particularly when two countries claim the right to tax the same income. Fortunately, Canada’s network of tax treaties provide mechanisms to prevent double taxation and resolve
Subsection 296(2.1) of the Excise Tax Act & Unclaimed GST/HST Rebates Subsection 296(2.1) of the Excise Tax Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. E-15 (“ETA”) allows the Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”), in certain circumstances, to recognize an eligible GST/HST rebate that was
Section 257 – Rebate for Taxable Sale of Real Property by a GST/HST Non-Registrant A person who carries on a business is normally required to register for GST/HST, charge and remit it to the Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”). A difficulty arises,
Canada v. Quebecor Inc., 2025 FCA 207 In Canada v. Quebecor Inc., 2025 FCA 207, the Federal Court of Appeal (“Court”) rejected the Appellant’s argument that the general anti-avoidance rule (“GAAR”) applied to a series of transactions undertaken to consolidate
The Estate of the Late Paul Uppal v. His Majesty the King, 2025 TCC 34 According to subsection 53(1) of the Tax Court of Canada Rules (General Procedure), the Tax Court of Canada (“TCC”) can “strike out or expunge all
Canada v. Loewen (F.C.A.), 2004 FCA 146, [2004] 4 FCR 3 Can the Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”), after the expiry of the reassessment period, defend an assessment by relying on a new legal argument or additional facts that were not
Employer Health Tax (EHT) Several Canadian provinces impose a payroll-based levy on employers commonly referred to as an Employer Health Tax (“EHT”). As of the date of this article, these regimes exist in the Canadian provinces of Ontario, British Columbia,
Understanding Canada’s Personal Services Business (PSB) For Tax Purposes In Canada, the concept of a Personal Services Business (PSB) under subsection 125(1) of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. 1 (5th Supp.) (“ITA”) is a critical tax classification that
Capital v. Income in Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited v. Canada, 2011 FCA 308 Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited v. Canada, 2011 FCA 308 (CanLII), [Imperial] concerns the characterization of payments made by a corporation as being on account of income or
What does it mean to “Demolish” the Minister’s Assumptions? The good thing about tax disputes is that there is little to no room to personally and vexatiously malign a party in an attempt to gain an advantage. For example, in
Milgram Foundation v. Canada (Attorney General), 2024 FC 1405 The Applicant, the Milgram Foundation, was established in 1964 as a non-resident entity in Liechtenstein and had not filed Canadian tax returns prior to 2015. In 2015, the Foundation applied under
Notice of Objection & Voluntary Disclosures Program The ability to file a Notice of Objection to Notices of Re/assessment issued following a Voluntary Disclosure, governed by IC00-1R6-Voluntary Disclosures Program (“IC00-1R6”), was limited to specific circumstances. Importantly, taxpayers could not file
Canada Repeals Digital Services Tax Canada has decided to repeal its Digital Services Tax (DST), meaning the requirement for businesses to file DST returns and pay related amounts will be suspended until the law is officially removed. The Canada Revenue
Devon Canada Corporation v. Canada, 2015 FCA 214 Devon Canada Corporation v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2015 FCA 214 [Devon] concerns the scope of what comprises a Notice of Objection under the Large Corporation Rule in subsection 169(2.1). The Federal Court